I usually do not react to this type of personal, aggressive and emotional notes that in general, more than the limited communication abilities , the author / in what, than they would like to be. I take back a single word of my objective assessment of this document , but as the many false assertions and allegations back in her article.
place So in my post not under my terms' division and sectarianism. " In my contribution, there are no "deliberately false statements." This distorted perception makes it fast to the non-quoted phrase of mine from Mrs. Langer, who has in relation to the "one-state solution" also said "the hope remains. This phrase has no political significance when, in her speech in full reads. One of her books with the title: "fight for hope." In fact, we should not deprive the Palestinian people the hope of a democratic state in their freedom from foreign occupation. That the State of Israel is one of those neighbors should the authors of the "Stuttgart Declaration" but also be clear. In this kind of "debate" I will not engage me anymore.
place So in my post not under my terms' division and sectarianism. " In my contribution, there are no "deliberately false statements." This distorted perception makes it fast to the non-quoted phrase of mine from Mrs. Langer, who has in relation to the "one-state solution" also said "the hope remains. This phrase has no political significance when, in her speech in full reads. One of her books with the title: "fight for hope." In fact, we should not deprive the Palestinian people the hope of a democratic state in their freedom from foreign occupation. That the State of Israel is one of those neighbors should the authors of the "Stuttgart Declaration" but also be clear. In this kind of "debate" I will not engage me anymore.
0 comments:
Post a Comment