The end of the Mubarak regime now seems doomed. Israel had initially defended the pharaoh still solid, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu changed his mind now. Whether it is also suitable, conditions for a future democratically legitimate government on the peace treaty of 1979 to provide, may be doubted. Obama was in his statements still undecided, but a few days ago, Israel had to be requested by the United States and European countries to support the Pharaoh on the Nile at all costs. Today was the pragmatic turn. Suddenly the continued occupation of the Palestinians to the top of the supporters of the democracy movement in Egypt. President Obama and his "willing accomplice" in Europe will recognize the signs of the times and finally determined to demand the departure of their satraps on the Nile.
The following sets of Netanyahu in the Knesset has to dissolve on the tongue can be: "All those who value freedom are inspired by the calls for democratic reforms in Egypt (...) An Egypt that will adopt these reforms will be a source of hope for the world. As much as the foundations for democracy are stronger, the foundations for peace are stronger. " Such sentences particularly surprised by a politician whose Country for over 43 years to suppress another people on the worst one. Forgetting is suddenly oppressive policies of Israel with the Egyptian autocrats against the Palestinian people. Since the Israeli government of years of uncertainty in Egypt starts, Netanyahu called for a "support for Israeli power." This is a reference to Obama and the Western European clients, to support Israel even stronger militarily. Of course I did not miss Netanyahu's demonization of Iran and the Islamists. "Our real fear is of a situation that could develop and ... Which has already developed in several countries including Iran itself - repressive regime of radical Islam," and he continued, "in a situation of chaos, of organized Islamist body can seize control of a country. It happened in Iran. It happened in other instances". Why does not care about its Netanyahn Jewish extremist rabbis who preach an open racism against all the Goyim (Gentiles) in Jewish fatwas or to its right-wing nationalist foreign minister, Mubarak has ever wished the hell?
see When the U.S. and the western allies finally, that Israel's interests which are diametrically opposite of the West? Israel imaginary enemies are not automatically "enemies" of the West. Who has the emergence of the so-called terrorist organizations in the Middle East much contributed? Israel through its colonial policies in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. Only after the invasion of Israel in 1982 in Lebanon and the establishment of a so-called security zone in the south of the country saw the establishment of Hezbollah. Only after the brutal suppression of the first Intifada in 1987 was Hamas. Through its senseless and politically irresponsible 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon are over 1 000 Israeli soldiers died for nothing, before Ehud Barak had started in May 2000, the hasty flight from Lebanon.
The Americans take maybe a larger debt because they are illegal under international law a protective hand over Israel Politics have held, although they knew that its policy against all "Western values." The U.S. has been with the fundamentalist regime in Saudi Arabia and the Pakistani secret service, the midwife of al-Qaida. At that time, but it went against the Soviet Union, now I use the bogeyman al-Qaida, a war against Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, and perhaps soon to lead against Iran. Maybe they should leave the U.S. and the West to disarm ideologically and influence no longer Israel's obsessive enemy.
an insight into the completely skewed view of Zionist-Israeli analysts are of the post by Ari Shavit . It would be disastrous, would line up Western policy in it. Maybe ask yourself once Shavit, which have helped the Israeli occupation policy and its blind support of the protective power of the USA to the decline of the West of a "betrayal of Mubarak" to speak from the West, the evidence of an Israeli-ethno-centric view of international politics, no one understands . represents a completely different position, however Bradley Burston , and corresponds to more Western-democratic thinking. He writes to resist the Israeli obsession with the Egyptian democracy movement constitutes a threat to Israel.
But the main problem seems Israel's so-called American Zionist brethren to be. If Malcolm Hoenlein , the influential executive vice president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, "Mohammed el-Baradei as a" Stohmann Iran "means, then you can guess the Israeli government only to protect themselves from such friends. Netanyahu seems politically wiser than some representatives of the "Israel lobby" to be in the United States.
The West should now follow the example of Netanyahu and finally put to the forefront of the democracy movement in Egypt, so he could regain some of its lost credibility, he has lost on the altar of blind Israel Solidarity, "national security" or "Western interests" by the pact with autocrats, despots and dictators. A democracy in the classical Western sense of the region would place the exclusive right of Israel to this patent the right light. The first democratic experiment in Palestine was prepared by the West in a military coup to an abrupt end. It could not be that a "terrorist organization" has been elected in free, equal, secret and universal suffrage to power. This example would have too much broadcast on the Arab despots and other "western interests" contradicted.
The following sets of Netanyahu in the Knesset has to dissolve on the tongue can be: "All those who value freedom are inspired by the calls for democratic reforms in Egypt (...) An Egypt that will adopt these reforms will be a source of hope for the world. As much as the foundations for democracy are stronger, the foundations for peace are stronger. " Such sentences particularly surprised by a politician whose Country for over 43 years to suppress another people on the worst one. Forgetting is suddenly oppressive policies of Israel with the Egyptian autocrats against the Palestinian people. Since the Israeli government of years of uncertainty in Egypt starts, Netanyahu called for a "support for Israeli power." This is a reference to Obama and the Western European clients, to support Israel even stronger militarily. Of course I did not miss Netanyahu's demonization of Iran and the Islamists. "Our real fear is of a situation that could develop and ... Which has already developed in several countries including Iran itself - repressive regime of radical Islam," and he continued, "in a situation of chaos, of organized Islamist body can seize control of a country. It happened in Iran. It happened in other instances". Why does not care about its Netanyahn Jewish extremist rabbis who preach an open racism against all the Goyim (Gentiles) in Jewish fatwas or to its right-wing nationalist foreign minister, Mubarak has ever wished the hell?
see When the U.S. and the western allies finally, that Israel's interests which are diametrically opposite of the West? Israel imaginary enemies are not automatically "enemies" of the West. Who has the emergence of the so-called terrorist organizations in the Middle East much contributed? Israel through its colonial policies in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. Only after the invasion of Israel in 1982 in Lebanon and the establishment of a so-called security zone in the south of the country saw the establishment of Hezbollah. Only after the brutal suppression of the first Intifada in 1987 was Hamas. Through its senseless and politically irresponsible 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon are over 1 000 Israeli soldiers died for nothing, before Ehud Barak had started in May 2000, the hasty flight from Lebanon.
The Americans take maybe a larger debt because they are illegal under international law a protective hand over Israel Politics have held, although they knew that its policy against all "Western values." The U.S. has been with the fundamentalist regime in Saudi Arabia and the Pakistani secret service, the midwife of al-Qaida. At that time, but it went against the Soviet Union, now I use the bogeyman al-Qaida, a war against Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, and perhaps soon to lead against Iran. Maybe they should leave the U.S. and the West to disarm ideologically and influence no longer Israel's obsessive enemy.
an insight into the completely skewed view of Zionist-Israeli analysts are of the post by Ari Shavit . It would be disastrous, would line up Western policy in it. Maybe ask yourself once Shavit, which have helped the Israeli occupation policy and its blind support of the protective power of the USA to the decline of the West of a "betrayal of Mubarak" to speak from the West, the evidence of an Israeli-ethno-centric view of international politics, no one understands . represents a completely different position, however Bradley Burston , and corresponds to more Western-democratic thinking. He writes to resist the Israeli obsession with the Egyptian democracy movement constitutes a threat to Israel.
But the main problem seems Israel's so-called American Zionist brethren to be. If Malcolm Hoenlein , the influential executive vice president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, "Mohammed el-Baradei as a" Stohmann Iran "means, then you can guess the Israeli government only to protect themselves from such friends. Netanyahu seems politically wiser than some representatives of the "Israel lobby" to be in the United States.
The West should now follow the example of Netanyahu and finally put to the forefront of the democracy movement in Egypt, so he could regain some of its lost credibility, he has lost on the altar of blind Israel Solidarity, "national security" or "Western interests" by the pact with autocrats, despots and dictators. A democracy in the classical Western sense of the region would place the exclusive right of Israel to this patent the right light. The first democratic experiment in Palestine was prepared by the West in a military coup to an abrupt end. It could not be that a "terrorist organization" has been elected in free, equal, secret and universal suffrage to power. This example would have too much broadcast on the Arab despots and other "western interests" contradicted.
0 comments:
Post a Comment