Barack Hussein Obama is a gifted orator, but nothing more. Could he score in the 2008 election campaign against a Republican Party still totally discredited by his eloquence, he was ordered back soon by the neo-conservative and reactionary forces in Washington on the carpet of the facts. "Yes we can!" Was his former magic formula. In the third year of his presidency, the only answer: "Yes, you can not"
foreign policy is the U.S. president one disappointment as once the "Knight of the Sorrowful Countenance." His talks in Ankara and Cairo have turned out to be what they were: rhetorical tranquilizers for the Muslim world. Had George W. Bush or a dizzying explanation for why Muslims hate the United States alleged, then Obama did not even bother an intellectual justification, but scattered like the sand of the Muslim male population simply "sleep sand in his eyes. Of these, the people of the Arab world had enough. One country after another crash, the U.S. puppets.
Obama and all enlightened Americans know that America is not problems in the Middle East are Muslims but their "Albatross like ally, Israel. This holds since the "magnificent" victory in the Six Day War of 1967, the various U.S. administrations in the political stranglehold. This "allies" is America's heaviest burden for a credible U.S. policy in the Middle East. He leads the U.S. in the same isolation, is located in Israel, ie the position of a "pariah" state.
Who the books "The Passionate Attachment" George W. Ball and Douglas B. Ball and "The Israel Lobby" by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt has read, can come to no other conclusion than that of Israel for the U.S. foreign policy, the greatest leaving for their credibility is. In this alliance, the double standards of U.S. politics for all to see, they are the sole political benefit of Israel. The most recent example of this harm to U.S. foreign policy was the U.S. government's veto against a resolution from the UN Security Council condemning the Israeli settlement policy. The vote was 14:1. Although the UN Security Council resolution has already watered down completely, has once again shown that the refusal front is against peace in the Middle East from the U.S. and its allies called Israel. Every protest and criticism against the Israeli colonization must concern itself primarily against the U.S. Government because they are the ones who finance the continued colonization of Palestine, not just those of also politically and justify. The Arab revolutions must be in a thrust not only against their oppressors, but especially against the American-Israeli alliance set up, which is essentially anti-Arab. For fear of their own people, these Arab despots come to terms with this alliance against the real interests their own people.
U.S. president, Obama has tried everything in advance of the vote to express its "president" colleagues to the presentation in the UN Security Council. Quasi U.S. President to "President" of a National Authority, he has located 50 minutes taking the time to take him by phone bullying on line. After Abbas was signaled by the PLO Executive Committee adopted a negative attitude, he gave this "no" next to Obama. Why Obama has stooped to such a humiliating gesture, it becomes clear how political this U.S. veto was absurd.
A year ago, Obama had demanded a settlement freeze with verve by Netanyahu. Forma liter was this for nine Months, "agreed," although Israel continued to build in the occupied territories and colonized. After that period had expired and they wanted to perform the farce of the "peace process" on the international stage on, almost begging Obama to Netanyahu, to agree an extension of three months, which rejected this sovereign. could plus a commitment for an indefinite period of time against all so-called veto UN resolutions critical of Israel not convince Netanyahu - Even the bribe with over 3.5 billion U.S. dollars extra - in addition to the normal 3 billion per year. He saw no reason to get involved in Obama's offer, he knew that he U.S. Congress and the "Israel Lobby" has in store.
This veto of the United States on Friday 18 February 2011, was pronounced against their own political beliefs. After Netanyahu not only U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden was publicly discredited in Jerusalem, he humiliated and Obama with his refusal to renew the colonization process by three months, after which Obama took the call for a settlement freeze just from the political agenda. The crowning glory of this self-denial process now even the Obama Administration voted against their own convictions. Ridiculous may be a "world power" to make any more. The Haaretz journalist Gideon Levy called it a veto against all hope, indeed it was even "not friendly to Israel, right it supports the settlers and the Israeli, and them alone".
This veto is against fundamental national interests of the United States. In a time when the Arab world is in turmoil and people fight for their freedom, the U.S. is on the side of the Israeli oppressor and colonialism and give the wrong signal to the Arab despots. Obama would not have been a clearer sign to send to the Arab world. In this position, the real reasons are that "hate" much of the Arab-Muslim world, the U.S., as it not only double standards measure, but because they stand on the side of the oppressors of freedom and self-determination, this may now be the colonialism of Israel or the repression of Arab despots.
I have always held the theory that Obama only represents a Bush-lite version of U.S. foreign policy. He is too much a "prisoner" of political interest groups, a particularly influential is the "Israel Lobby" dar. his discretion in matters of the Middle East is low, especially in a quite conservative-oriented U.S. Congress. Also in Europe, Obama's star has faded, and not just because it's political disunity of the "EU Leaders' sucks, but because his political Attention is directed to Asia. Here are the future challenges of the U.S. empire.
The powerful alliance of U.S. and Israeli government are in danger of a site which has located the Israeli government as enemy already, and that the BDS campaign and the international solidarity movement with the Palestinian people. With the weapons of "soft power" is one against the two nuclear powers and makes their anti-democratic as well as international law and human rights misconduct to the public pillory. This "legitimacy war" as he called the American international lawyer Richard Falk sees so far only one winner: the Palestinians under occupation and in exile.
This can free the U.S. administration from the Arabic " quicksand " (Geoffrey Wawro ) should make it a reverse turn 180 degrees in its Middle East policy. This includes an immediate end to their neo-colonial wars of conquest in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as a relaxation of its submissive attitude towards Israel. U.S. interests are very different from Israel. Similarly, the U.S. should be at the forefront of the democratic revolutions in the Arab world. Western values of freedom and loyalty to dictators are contradictory opposites. The revolutionary upheavals in the Arab world also a rejection of American-Israeli-Egyptian alliance against the Palestinian people. In light of the revolutionary upheavals in the Arab world should the Palestinian "president" and his friends recognize the signs of the times and voluntarily leave the political stage and the legitimate democratic government it back in her office.
foreign policy is the U.S. president one disappointment as once the "Knight of the Sorrowful Countenance." His talks in Ankara and Cairo have turned out to be what they were: rhetorical tranquilizers for the Muslim world. Had George W. Bush or a dizzying explanation for why Muslims hate the United States alleged, then Obama did not even bother an intellectual justification, but scattered like the sand of the Muslim male population simply "sleep sand in his eyes. Of these, the people of the Arab world had enough. One country after another crash, the U.S. puppets.
Obama and all enlightened Americans know that America is not problems in the Middle East are Muslims but their "Albatross like ally, Israel. This holds since the "magnificent" victory in the Six Day War of 1967, the various U.S. administrations in the political stranglehold. This "allies" is America's heaviest burden for a credible U.S. policy in the Middle East. He leads the U.S. in the same isolation, is located in Israel, ie the position of a "pariah" state.
Who the books "The Passionate Attachment" George W. Ball and Douglas B. Ball and "The Israel Lobby" by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt has read, can come to no other conclusion than that of Israel for the U.S. foreign policy, the greatest leaving for their credibility is. In this alliance, the double standards of U.S. politics for all to see, they are the sole political benefit of Israel. The most recent example of this harm to U.S. foreign policy was the U.S. government's veto against a resolution from the UN Security Council condemning the Israeli settlement policy. The vote was 14:1. Although the UN Security Council resolution has already watered down completely, has once again shown that the refusal front is against peace in the Middle East from the U.S. and its allies called Israel. Every protest and criticism against the Israeli colonization must concern itself primarily against the U.S. Government because they are the ones who finance the continued colonization of Palestine, not just those of also politically and justify. The Arab revolutions must be in a thrust not only against their oppressors, but especially against the American-Israeli alliance set up, which is essentially anti-Arab. For fear of their own people, these Arab despots come to terms with this alliance against the real interests their own people.
U.S. president, Obama has tried everything in advance of the vote to express its "president" colleagues to the presentation in the UN Security Council. Quasi U.S. President to "President" of a National Authority, he has located 50 minutes taking the time to take him by phone bullying on line. After Abbas was signaled by the PLO Executive Committee adopted a negative attitude, he gave this "no" next to Obama. Why Obama has stooped to such a humiliating gesture, it becomes clear how political this U.S. veto was absurd.
A year ago, Obama had demanded a settlement freeze with verve by Netanyahu. Forma liter was this for nine Months, "agreed," although Israel continued to build in the occupied territories and colonized. After that period had expired and they wanted to perform the farce of the "peace process" on the international stage on, almost begging Obama to Netanyahu, to agree an extension of three months, which rejected this sovereign. could plus a commitment for an indefinite period of time against all so-called veto UN resolutions critical of Israel not convince Netanyahu - Even the bribe with over 3.5 billion U.S. dollars extra - in addition to the normal 3 billion per year. He saw no reason to get involved in Obama's offer, he knew that he U.S. Congress and the "Israel Lobby" has in store.
This veto of the United States on Friday 18 February 2011, was pronounced against their own political beliefs. After Netanyahu not only U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden was publicly discredited in Jerusalem, he humiliated and Obama with his refusal to renew the colonization process by three months, after which Obama took the call for a settlement freeze just from the political agenda. The crowning glory of this self-denial process now even the Obama Administration voted against their own convictions. Ridiculous may be a "world power" to make any more. The Haaretz journalist Gideon Levy called it a veto against all hope, indeed it was even "not friendly to Israel, right it supports the settlers and the Israeli, and them alone".
This veto is against fundamental national interests of the United States. In a time when the Arab world is in turmoil and people fight for their freedom, the U.S. is on the side of the Israeli oppressor and colonialism and give the wrong signal to the Arab despots. Obama would not have been a clearer sign to send to the Arab world. In this position, the real reasons are that "hate" much of the Arab-Muslim world, the U.S., as it not only double standards measure, but because they stand on the side of the oppressors of freedom and self-determination, this may now be the colonialism of Israel or the repression of Arab despots.
I have always held the theory that Obama only represents a Bush-lite version of U.S. foreign policy. He is too much a "prisoner" of political interest groups, a particularly influential is the "Israel Lobby" dar. his discretion in matters of the Middle East is low, especially in a quite conservative-oriented U.S. Congress. Also in Europe, Obama's star has faded, and not just because it's political disunity of the "EU Leaders' sucks, but because his political Attention is directed to Asia. Here are the future challenges of the U.S. empire.
The powerful alliance of U.S. and Israeli government are in danger of a site which has located the Israeli government as enemy already, and that the BDS campaign and the international solidarity movement with the Palestinian people. With the weapons of "soft power" is one against the two nuclear powers and makes their anti-democratic as well as international law and human rights misconduct to the public pillory. This "legitimacy war" as he called the American international lawyer Richard Falk sees so far only one winner: the Palestinians under occupation and in exile.
This can free the U.S. administration from the Arabic " quicksand " (Geoffrey Wawro ) should make it a reverse turn 180 degrees in its Middle East policy. This includes an immediate end to their neo-colonial wars of conquest in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as a relaxation of its submissive attitude towards Israel. U.S. interests are very different from Israel. Similarly, the U.S. should be at the forefront of the democratic revolutions in the Arab world. Western values of freedom and loyalty to dictators are contradictory opposites. The revolutionary upheavals in the Arab world also a rejection of American-Israeli-Egyptian alliance against the Palestinian people. In light of the revolutionary upheavals in the Arab world should the Palestinian "president" and his friends recognize the signs of the times and voluntarily leave the political stage and the legitimate democratic government it back in her office.
0 comments:
Post a Comment