The debate about the sense or nonsense of a one-state solution as a "silver bullet" to solve the Middle East conflict, as has been represented by the so-called Stuttgart Declaration, is to the next round. No less than the historian and political scientist Ilan Pappé the German scene beige skipped intellectually, to save what can still be saved is.
The criticism of the so-called "Stuttgart Declaration in which sought a one-state solution as the target for the settlement of the conflict and for the BDS campaign as a vehicle is claimed, has been criticized as unfair and dogmatic, as well as" utopia "means that can not be based on an actual and necessary campaign to put pressure on the Zionist state of Israel and promote self-determination for the Palestinians want. Representatives of a two-state solution has been certified in return a dogmatic adherence to the two-state solution of the writers / artist, which also repeated the part of Ilan Pappe is attested to by its proponents an "orthodox approach.
The utopia of a one-state solution is now scientifically enhanced, by being in the status of a "paradigm shift" does, so if you like, against criticism "immunized" and not declared to debate. Here, the idea of a very old hat and one-state solution has failed historically. It has now been fished out of the helplessness of the historical reminiscences Asservatenkammer out new drapes and presented as a "paradigm" to the public as a deus ex machina. (In parenthesis it should be mentioned for the scientifically-interested, that a paradigm shift only then can be said when the "old" paradigm has been falsified scientific or representative of such an "extinct" means.) However, it can be no question, because right now the "old" paradigm of two-state solution back with a vengeance on the world stage celebrates. That just sent
Ilan Pappé as witness for the state solution in the ring afterwards surprised, very much. In his article on a so-called "paradigm shift" he has a one-state solution in the BDS campaign mentioned in passing without really express it explicitly. In his interesting lectures in Stuttgart and the panel discussion, he mentioned the one-state solution with no word. Pappé talking about colonialism, zionism, ethnic cleansing and the concept of "ethnic purity of Israel" and its connection to the right of return for Palestinians.
Its main argument is against Zionism. The Zionist ideology is the main obstacle to a peaceful solution to the Middle East conflict dar. offer in this question is no dissent whatsoever between him and the "orthodox approach. That the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a colonial conflict, no one denies, and that Zionism has any good qualities, only claimed by its protagonists. For the colonized, this ideology means the almost total destruction of their existence in their home country.
The actions of the BDS campaign should therefore political and economic costs of occupation and the cooperation of States with the World colonizers been up in the air, that they are more portable for anyone. Your goal must be directed to the nationalist-ethnocentric ideology of Zionism which is contrary to the classic Western democracy diametrical. "Jewish and democartic" is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. The representative of a single state should ask the Israeli-Zionist political elite, whether they even unwilling to meet the State of Israel, based on a Zionist legislation and its implementation, to integrate into the Middle East, let alone to let it rise, then?
In his autobiographical work " Out Of The Frame " Pappé no mention of a one-state solution as a conflict resolution model, nor in his recent interview in the weekly magazine "Friday" of 16 January 2011. In his Epilogue chapter of "Project: Disarm Israel" is not about state solution, which would mean the end of Israel as a state, what Pappé, I suspect, certainly not willing, but the main opponent of Judaism, Zionism und dessen zionistisch-kolonisatorisches Projekt in Palästina. „I do not recall the precise moment of awakening, but there was such a moment when the un-Jewishness and immorality of the project became clear to me. I did, and still equate Jewishness and morality, not as superior to any other position, but rather a comfortable heritage I belong to and I can rely on when making moral judgments. And from this perspective, the Zionist project abused this kind of Judaism and this kind of morality. Worst of all was the Zionist and later Israeli abuse of the Holocaust memory to justify the dispossession of Palestine that disconcerted and outraged me. The abuse is obvious and yet so many today can still not see it. It was the departure point human and Jewish that recently led so many Jews to oppose policies and crimes done in the name of the state of Israel. "Papp project of the" disarmament of Israel "means an" ideological disarmament ", that is, a de-Zionization Israel, but not its destruction or dissolution. The one-state solution is probably for him only "a dream" of a good world without evil state, a new beginning that may be called the land of Palestine, if one can understand his struggle for land and State Sun
Ilan Pappe has also at the Stuttgart Conference on the scandal of the 21 Century spoken, namely the Israeli occupation and ongoing colonization of Palestine. The Activists, he recommends that you conduct an intensive dialogue with Israel, which sees itself as part of the "civilized" world, while maintaining his "racist and supremacist" character. Who "Zionist mindset" the (board) does not understand, will also have no success in solving the Middle East conflict, be it in a one-or two-state solution.
The question is not answered, who should realize the the new paradigm of power politics. It provides only a few keywords as headings, without being filled with substantial content. Now Playing at the international level, an unprecedented wave of diplomatic recognition of the State of Palestine. It is speculated that not even the U.S. a state of Palestine in 2011 to recognize diplomatically. Apart from some activists in the world no one is talking about a one-state solution. Except for a handful of Israelis believe that almost 100 percent of the Israelis the idea of a "bad joke". Israeli Friends / interior gave me to the question of one-state solution to the answer: "Are you kidding" (Want to take you on my arms?) Before the one-state solution can be implemented, it must first take place a "deprogramming" of the political consciousness of the Israelis , Cardboard (to himself) so wonderfully executed and described in Stuttgart and in his book has described.
who only "salvation" sees one-state solution takes the Palestinian people the opportunity to make a free decision for his future. The right to self-determination is the Palestinians as well as to the Israelis. Only if the former have come into their own, they have the option to choose other options. The solidarity movement will not be the serious smarter than the collective will of the Palestinian people! To German concerns and qualms should generally take no consideration, as they are in relation to the Middle East conflict apolitical, that is one-sided. "Stuttgart was a station. The train goes somewhere else now continue "as Pappé euphemistically describes. I hope he does not drive to nowhere.
The criticism of the so-called "Stuttgart Declaration in which sought a one-state solution as the target for the settlement of the conflict and for the BDS campaign as a vehicle is claimed, has been criticized as unfair and dogmatic, as well as" utopia "means that can not be based on an actual and necessary campaign to put pressure on the Zionist state of Israel and promote self-determination for the Palestinians want. Representatives of a two-state solution has been certified in return a dogmatic adherence to the two-state solution of the writers / artist, which also repeated the part of Ilan Pappe is attested to by its proponents an "orthodox approach.
The utopia of a one-state solution is now scientifically enhanced, by being in the status of a "paradigm shift" does, so if you like, against criticism "immunized" and not declared to debate. Here, the idea of a very old hat and one-state solution has failed historically. It has now been fished out of the helplessness of the historical reminiscences Asservatenkammer out new drapes and presented as a "paradigm" to the public as a deus ex machina. (In parenthesis it should be mentioned for the scientifically-interested, that a paradigm shift only then can be said when the "old" paradigm has been falsified scientific or representative of such an "extinct" means.) However, it can be no question, because right now the "old" paradigm of two-state solution back with a vengeance on the world stage celebrates. That just sent
Ilan Pappé as witness for the state solution in the ring afterwards surprised, very much. In his article on a so-called "paradigm shift" he has a one-state solution in the BDS campaign mentioned in passing without really express it explicitly. In his interesting lectures in Stuttgart and the panel discussion, he mentioned the one-state solution with no word. Pappé talking about colonialism, zionism, ethnic cleansing and the concept of "ethnic purity of Israel" and its connection to the right of return for Palestinians.
Its main argument is against Zionism. The Zionist ideology is the main obstacle to a peaceful solution to the Middle East conflict dar. offer in this question is no dissent whatsoever between him and the "orthodox approach. That the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a colonial conflict, no one denies, and that Zionism has any good qualities, only claimed by its protagonists. For the colonized, this ideology means the almost total destruction of their existence in their home country.
The actions of the BDS campaign should therefore political and economic costs of occupation and the cooperation of States with the World colonizers been up in the air, that they are more portable for anyone. Your goal must be directed to the nationalist-ethnocentric ideology of Zionism which is contrary to the classic Western democracy diametrical. "Jewish and democartic" is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. The representative of a single state should ask the Israeli-Zionist political elite, whether they even unwilling to meet the State of Israel, based on a Zionist legislation and its implementation, to integrate into the Middle East, let alone to let it rise, then?
In his autobiographical work " Out Of The Frame " Pappé no mention of a one-state solution as a conflict resolution model, nor in his recent interview in the weekly magazine "Friday" of 16 January 2011. In his Epilogue chapter of "Project: Disarm Israel" is not about state solution, which would mean the end of Israel as a state, what Pappé, I suspect, certainly not willing, but the main opponent of Judaism, Zionism und dessen zionistisch-kolonisatorisches Projekt in Palästina. „I do not recall the precise moment of awakening, but there was such a moment when the un-Jewishness and immorality of the project became clear to me. I did, and still equate Jewishness and morality, not as superior to any other position, but rather a comfortable heritage I belong to and I can rely on when making moral judgments. And from this perspective, the Zionist project abused this kind of Judaism and this kind of morality. Worst of all was the Zionist and later Israeli abuse of the Holocaust memory to justify the dispossession of Palestine that disconcerted and outraged me. The abuse is obvious and yet so many today can still not see it. It was the departure point human and Jewish that recently led so many Jews to oppose policies and crimes done in the name of the state of Israel. "Papp project of the" disarmament of Israel "means an" ideological disarmament ", that is, a de-Zionization Israel, but not its destruction or dissolution. The one-state solution is probably for him only "a dream" of a good world without evil state, a new beginning that may be called the land of Palestine, if one can understand his struggle for land and State Sun
Ilan Pappe has also at the Stuttgart Conference on the scandal of the 21 Century spoken, namely the Israeli occupation and ongoing colonization of Palestine. The Activists, he recommends that you conduct an intensive dialogue with Israel, which sees itself as part of the "civilized" world, while maintaining his "racist and supremacist" character. Who "Zionist mindset" the (board) does not understand, will also have no success in solving the Middle East conflict, be it in a one-or two-state solution.
The question is not answered, who should realize the the new paradigm of power politics. It provides only a few keywords as headings, without being filled with substantial content. Now Playing at the international level, an unprecedented wave of diplomatic recognition of the State of Palestine. It is speculated that not even the U.S. a state of Palestine in 2011 to recognize diplomatically. Apart from some activists in the world no one is talking about a one-state solution. Except for a handful of Israelis believe that almost 100 percent of the Israelis the idea of a "bad joke". Israeli Friends / interior gave me to the question of one-state solution to the answer: "Are you kidding" (Want to take you on my arms?) Before the one-state solution can be implemented, it must first take place a "deprogramming" of the political consciousness of the Israelis , Cardboard (to himself) so wonderfully executed and described in Stuttgart and in his book has described.
who only "salvation" sees one-state solution takes the Palestinian people the opportunity to make a free decision for his future. The right to self-determination is the Palestinians as well as to the Israelis. Only if the former have come into their own, they have the option to choose other options. The solidarity movement will not be the serious smarter than the collective will of the Palestinian people! To German concerns and qualms should generally take no consideration, as they are in relation to the Middle East conflict apolitical, that is one-sided. "Stuttgart was a station. The train goes somewhere else now continue "as Pappé euphemistically describes. I hope he does not drive to nowhere.
0 comments:
Post a Comment