Remington Clipper Accessories

initiative to protect against weapons violence (Entwaffnungsinitiative)

goes for the Swiss this time around a lot. An imaginary opponents of arms "initiative to protect against weapons of violence" would significant changes in gun laws cause. The demagogues set deliberately on the fear element in the un-informed, suggesting an improvement of the "threat". On 13 February 2011 the Swiss people vote via this popular initiative.



Switzerland is recognized as one of the last bastions of liberal gun ownership. A Entwaffnungsinitiative will replace the existing licensing and inspection system for weapons but a new one. By pacifist groups under the leadership of the Socialist Party (SP) launched a popular initiative will exacerbate the current gun laws radical. It calls on the pretext of fighting of violent crimes and the abolition of home delivery of the personal weapon of Swiss Army militiamen.

Receivables
- Commodities and Capability for the acquisition and possession of firearms
- prohibition of so-called "most dangerous weapons" such as automatic firearms and pump actions
- Establishment of a central Arms Register
the federal government - agreed not to home delivery of the personal weapon of the members of the army
- Prohibition, the Army dismissed from military service members leave their weapons

The Swiss Federal Council has reviewed the initiative and does it off without a counteroffer. He believes that the protection from misuse of weapons in the current gun laws sufficiently taken into account and that in the field artillery in steps have been taken to prevent possible abuses with Ordonnanzwaffen. The Defence Committee of the National Council (SiK-N) recommends their advice, the initiative "Protection from armed violence" with 18 votes to 8 to reject.

pursued basically the Entwaffnungsinitiative two goals. She wants to reduce the backlog and make it difficult for new acquisition. The initiative would be adopted, including the introduction of the need principle would be the result.


The need principle
With the need principle of management is a very clever tool is placed in the hand to regulate gun owners and control. Also, a need principle is very good for the screws to systematically attract. A gradual and permanent tightening gun laws is thus open the floodgates.

distinguishes a rule, the need principle in various groups of gun owners. This can be: Sport shooters, hunters, collectors and weapons experts. Rifles is a further differentiation possible after shooting disciplines. Every gun owner must be in accordance. the need to him by the administration was admitted to regularly provide the evidence justifying its need. Self-defense is not commonly recognized as a need basis.

the same time, so still reached a very useful side effect: It splits the gun owners into several groups. Gun owners take only as belonging to a sub-group was. Either an Olympic shooter or hunter or collector or IPSC shooter, etc. - but not more than gun owners as a whole. This allows the groups better off against each other and common actions on a broad front are largely excluded. Other laws tightened likely.
The need principle is like herpes: Did it once, do not you get it going again.

Furthermore sought a ban on all weapons categories. The infamous "Pump-Gun", this paragon of hell, is tilting at once. They lost to the cross section dubious representation in TV series by non-specialist directors. A reliable statistics on the "special danger" of this weapon does not exist anyway.


The driving force: "Women in Fear"
based to a large extent the justification Entwaffnungsinitiative of the fear element and the "tense threat" in Switzerland. Women in particular, it is suggested, face a constant threat from armed violence. Even if that really would be created by a Entwaffnungsinitiative even more security. It is aimed just against those who do not present a security risk, militiamen and responsible citizens. The initiative does not prevent the criminal misuse and illegal weapons and fight as little to reflect the real causes of domestic violence and suicides.

The cost
silent as to costs, the initiators of the Entwaffnungsidee. For the establishment of a central arms register of all weapons detection is necessary. This is not just about the military weapons in private hands, but to ALL weapons. The additional administrative burden will undoubtedly increase in the billions CHF. A work that will stand in no relation to the benefits. In addition, the implementation of the need principle will increase the bureaucracy and burden on the budget with ongoing cost. Financial resources that could be better used elsewhere. For example. for the construction of new shooting ranges ...


References:
http://www.waffeninitiative-nein.ch/

What Do I Wear With Red Ball Gown

The "Palestine Papers": a story of intense cooperation

The death of a liberation movement occurs when the oppressed begin to negotiate in confidence with their oppressors on the extent of their oppression. The first nail in the coffin in this macabre spectacle of PLO leader Yasser Arafat has missed most, even with the signing of the Oslo Accords of 1993, the "Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The swan song of this "liberation movement" However his successor, such as "President" Abbas, Fayyad, Qurei, Erekat, Abed-Rabbo, Dahlan, and many others, be true. They are the ones who benefit royally by the occupation of Palestine and enjoy their VIP status at the expense of the oppressed population.

The "Palestine Papers (PP) document very clearly the close cooperation between the colonial power, Israel, her protector, the United States, and is colonized. She even went so far that these "representatives of the Palestinian people" had no scruples to have done the massacre of its own population in the Gaza Strip without protest although they have been notified in advance of them. Why should they? Was it just before the coup of Mahmoud Dahlan with the help of the United States, Israel and the Palestinians, Abbas against the democratically elected Hamas government in Gaza Strip have failed. Hamas has anticipated this plot and has the governor of Israel and the United States, Dahlan and his cronies, distributed from there.

The PP also show that the current leadership is only marginally deviated from the guidelines Yasser Arafat. The agreements of Taba in January 2001 have laid the groundwork for this far-reaching compromises. It was only in the acceptance of almost all the settlements, control over East Jerusalem and the Haram al-Sharif, moreover, was otherwise it is largely to the so-called Clinton parameters. The Abbas-Palestinians against the Israelis came so far without having collectively to convert to Zionism. Accurate than Saeb Erekat can not establish the compromise of Abbas' government ":" The only thing I can not do is convert to Zionism. "Similarly, as in Taba is one ready when the right of return of 1948 refugees, East Jerusalem capital to sacrifice the illegal colonization of their homeland, the 1949 borders, / 1967, the security issue much more broadly to, to finally come to a country, whatever that may look too. Know the Member States of the United Nations really which entity they want to recognize as a sovereign state " Palestine"? To illustrate all this card is recommended, more reminiscent of the islands of Micronesia. (Sh Map archipelago Palestine).

Despite these were far-reaching concessions to settlers not ready to meet the king without a country and dresses. The political coup, the Ehud Barak and U.S. President Bill Clinton at Camp David in July 2000 against Yasser Arafat landed that he was no partner for peace, was punished by the PP lies. These publications lead the world the denial of the Zionist-Israeli political elite in mind. If there is no Partners for Peace in Palestine, then there are the Israeli government. Not for the attitude of the Palestinians take to the characterization of the former Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban, but it accurately describes the attitude of the various Israeli governments: ". They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity" for anyone who knows the history of Palestine, was this is clear from the beginning of the colonization of this country by Zionism. The colonists do to this day the whole land of Palestine, but original as possible without its inhabitants. The diaries of former Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett put it are eloquent testimony of how Israel since Beginning of the founding of the state has done everything to destabilize its neighbors and to torpedo any peace efforts.

What the PP also show, the dubious role the U.S. plays in this "peace process". You are not only not a "honest broker", this they have never been, but its Middle East policy is entirely in the hands of the Israelis. Abbas is in the PP with a sentence he has sent Mitchell to the Middle East envoy, as saying. "Nineteen years of promises and you have not made up your minds what you want to do with us" The latest surrender U.S. President Obama on Binyamin Netanyahu disclose who the U.S. Middle East policy toward Israel formulated in the USA: the "Israel Lobby". At this point, the tail wags the dog actually.

The publications of the "Palestine Papers fall into a turbulent time. An Arab regime or the other is about to collapse. This "Wind of Change" could reach the Occupied Territories and sweep the "president of Palestine" and its cronies out of office and out of the country over the Jordan. The regime of the "Gambling King" in Jordan could change. Generally, all the Arab regimes are built on shifting sand. Legitimacy they do not fast. If in addition to the Mubarak regime, the "Palestinian Authority" Jordan and disappear from the pages of history, Israel would be left without its so-called friends. It might be true in fact, the racist remark Ehud Barak of Israel as the "villa in the jungle," but then it wore the Israeli political elite because of their political intransigence sole responsibility that the "Palestine Papers" also documented.

The U.S. political elite knows that the current Palestinian leadership is illegitimate "President" Abbas, on "prime minister" Fayyad. The only democratically legitimate leadership is composed of representatives of Hamas; in 2006 they voted in free, fair, secret and universal suffrage by an absolute majority. At the behest of the U.S. and Israel had to Abbas, they stage a coup on the office. The calls of the United States and its Western European allies for free elections and democratic reforms in the Arab world are not necessarily credible. How will the West react if Islamic parties take power democratically in some countries? Will there be another coup by the military in Algeria? President Obama should finally be at his full-bodied rhetoric when he declared that America was firmly convinced that all men sought for the following criteria, namely "the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed, confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and free of corruption, and the freedom to live as you choose. These are human rights, and we support them everywhere ". This really belongs to the American Creed. It is high time that the U.S. demand not only to their "friends" in the Arab world but also to Israel's oppressive policies towards the Palestinians. The brutal, violent policies of Israel against the Palestinian people can only be accomplished by a change in U.S. foreign policy. Only thus can to free the U.S. from their double standards, nowhere to be seen except by the ruling elite in some countries of Western Europe, few Arab despots and other dictatorships. The peoples of these countries have thought no longer of U.S. propaganda, and denounce the double standard.

The Abbas-cronies enjoy one last reprieve before the vote on the recognition of a Palestinian state in the UN Security Council. Should the U.S. there again veto, the Abbas regime will no longer be able to hold on to power. Only through the establishment of a Palestinian state and recognition by the international community, Israel is so under international Pressure can be set so that it must end its 44-year occupation of Palestine and return to the Palestinian people of their dignity. Prerequisite for this is an admission of guilt and an official apology from the Israeli political leadership for the historic injustice and the suffering that has brought the Zionist colonization of the Palestinian people.

F*cku - Brent Everett

For a democratic regime " Change in the Arab World

What has overtaken the Eastern bloc in 1989, is deferred at last in the Arab world. "Regime Change" is announced, but not in the sense of former U.S. President George W. Bush in the form of a military assault, but through elections and democratic Protest of the incapacitated and harassed citizens. The stone came in a seemingly "stable" Western-oriented Arab country rolling: Tunisia. The spark seems to 'jumping. Protest demonstrations in Egypt and Yemen seem to announce the end of the rule of Arab despots, although this will not be easy for the people. The "Wind of Change" should ultimately pay off the fundamentalist regime of the sides of the story: Saudi Arabia. Whether this will permit the U.S. empire, but may be doubted. The so-called Western security in the form of "Oilism" is at stake, democratic reforms or not. A dictatorship is the U.S. empire always emerged from rather than a free and democratic elections, Islamic movements, as was the case in the case of the electoral victory of Hamas in Palestine. Within a year, had the Palestinian "president" Mahmoud Abbas against the coup by the majority of the people democratically elected government took office at the behest of the U.S. and Israel and set up a two authorizing the governor in the person of Salman Fayyad.

And what does the American Empire or the EU "superpower" to the difficulties of their despotic charges in the region "Greater Middle East"? In Tunisia, they were speechless. In Egypt, we are hurried from the American Pharaoh suddenly demand the observance of democratic rules and reforms, this one had 30 years. The U.S. State Department spokesman PJ Crowley called the Arab television station Al-Jazeera Egypt as an "ally, friend and partner" of the United States and as a "stabilizing force in the region." He went so far as to say that the Mubarak regime is "at anchor of stability in the Middle East." As formerly Jimmy Carter, the Shah's regime shortly before its collapse as an "island of stability" praised. Was in fact the Mubarak dictatorship, like all dictatorships, for a time apparently an "anchor of stability" and a willing ally the American-Israeli alliance against the interests of the Palestinian and Egyptian people.

Hillary Clinton appealed to the protesters, "restraint" in his looks and to take from violence. It is nowhere recorded that she had the demonstrators in Iran and called for violence in their protests, as they demonstrated against the election rigging. For decades, no one was interested in Washington for democratic reform in the Arab world. Two days after the outbreak of the demonstrations in Egypt in the comments of U.S. President Obama Clinton and U.S. Secretary of State no longer a unanimous Mubarak's support for the speech. It seems that one thinks of the day after, and without saying it, to Mohammed el-Baradei, his release from house arrest, calling for the U.S. officials have yet. Maybe Obama and Clinton learn from former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at least something that is actually in a speech at the American University of Cairo following has said: "For sixty years, my country, the United States, pursued stability at the expense of democracy in this region, neither here in the Middle East, and we achieved. Now, we are taking a different course. We are supporting the democratic aspirations of all people. "This rhetoric but no action followed to this day. Thus the democratic Expectations of the Palestinians in 2006 immediately smothered by the American-Israeli alliance in the bud.

The dilemmas of the U.S. empire in the Middle East are that democratic movements in this region have an Islamic thrust the United States and is the fetish of "political stability" of democratic governance in its client states. This of course includes the suppression of self-determination of the Egyptian and the Palestinian people with a. The U.S. pays Egypt a year about 1, 5 billion U.S. dollars because the country is an ally of Israel and also in the oppression of the Palestinians and involved the demonization of Islam in Egypt and Palestine Beweghung active. There is also support for the war on terrorism "on the part of Egypt and the Yemen, Jordan's Gambling-Kings and the Saudi Arabian fundamentalist regime, all" allies "of the U.S. empire.

"political stability" enjoys in the minds of U.S. political elite top priority of any despot, autocrat or dictator in the "western interests" guaranteed. A country that is itself derived from an anti-colonial revolt, the guardians of the status quo, ie the conservation of the most reactionary regime of the World has become, and this all in the name of "political stability" and "Western interests". If ever an American government would have been true democracy, they would always have to be at the forefront of democratic movements that happened in the case of Germany and Japan. But in the Near and Middle East, the opposite is the case, coups d'etat have been initiated worldwide against democratically elected governments in Iran, Chile, to many banana republics in Central and South America, or most recently in Palestine, as with US- -Israeli-Palestinian support a democratic government elected from the Office has been the coup. But the U.S. Empire was also not too bad, Islamic fundamentalists as a "resistance groups" feed up as it went against the Soviet Union, such as al-Qaida. Today drums again the most reactionary neo-conservative circles in the U.S. for to delete the group "People's Mujahideen" from the "terrorist list" of the U.S. empire in order to exploit against the democratically elected government of Iran.

If the U.S. had ever been interested in the democratization of the Arab world, not only in the exploitation of its resources and the dominance of the region, they had long been a protective hand over the fundamentalist regime across the region, Saudi Arabia to withdraw must. You would not create together with the Saudis and Pakistani intelligence to al-Qaida, they now account for around a phantom and fight to stabilize their geopolitical interests in the region. And the so-called willing accomplices countries in Europe do not see this? They still think that they would be fighting for democracy, women's rights, good governance and other political phrases. This western soldiers die in Afghanistan for a corrupt regime that is not worthy to be kept a day longer in power.

The biggest problem the U.S. empire and its Western supporters but their double standards. Obsessed with the idea of "spreading democracy" they make no difference in their choice of "Bedfellows" (bed-fellows). This was once the Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, the Shah of Iran, Saddam Hussein, who later mutated into the "Hitler", Osama bin Laden and many others even today are America's best friends, the dictators in Central Asia and in parts of the Arab world, all of sympathetic to the Israeli occupation in Palestine behave. The unconditional support of Israeli repression seems long the Achilles heel of the U.S. Empire and its western supporters to be. It is increasingly clear that the Israeli occupation regime can be maintained only by the military and financial support of the West. And here we come full circle: If the U.S. empire is not at the forefront of the democracy and freedom of movement is, and this in particular with regard to the freedom of Palestine, it will lose in the long term more credibility, and not just politically but also morally and financially. set alone, only the "Alabtross like ally, Israel" is no longer enough.

Can I Use My Blackberry On A Prepaid Vodafone

Dieter Vieweger dispute over the Holy Land

Once again, to an American president to resolve the Middle East conflict and is trying so formidable failed. Against the will of the Israeli government and its supporters in the U.S. seems even the only super power to be powerless to speak of European "superpower" not at all. It seems as if the conflict "intractable" and must go on ad infinitum. The just-released shows "Palestine papers" that Israel is prepared on a "peace" only on his terms. As long as the Palestinians do not waive any claim, Israel will never compromise. For Israel, it would be best that the Palestinians pack their bags and made their way to Jordan, then, Zionism had achieved his goal of "eternal peace" could finally break through the Israeli "state solution".

handled with great thoroughness of the Protestant theologian and anthropologist Dieter Vieweger one lasting for over 120 years of conflict over Palestine. The combination of both disciplines with a deeper understanding of a conflict that is too often dominated by stereotypes. The author stresses that culminate especially in Jerusalem, Jewish, Christian and Muslim traditions. This view seems to be but still not under the Israeli right-wing nationalist government enforced to have.

The author considers the religion a lot to the great importance. In the Middle East conflict is a colonial conflict in which it's all about the land of Palestine. The religious trappings from the religious fundamentalists in Israel took place only after the Six-Day War of 1967. On the Palestinian side, Hamas does as a religious claim to all of Palestine. By the Zionist colonization, the bar was any religious reason, the original inhabitants of Palestine will be deprived of their existence and livelihood peu à peu. This process continues today. Apart from its Judeo-Christian bias, the Palestinian side comes off way too short, the book is its historical and cartographic illustrations well done.

Published here.

What Store Can You Buy Steep Techs?

Moshe Zuckermann, "anti-Semite!"

The title of the book by Israeli historian Moshe Zuckermann could have been formulated not appropriate. The accusation of "anti-Semitism" is the politically most profitable over the critics of Israeli occupation and oppression against the Palestinian people in their home country. This outrageous accusation is not the neo-Nazis, but leaders of both Jewish and non-Jewish Provenance covered. At the forefront of this smear campaign, the current right-wing nationalist Israeli Government is acting together with their fans in the U.S., Israel and much of Western Europe. As it said the Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, after the UN Human Rights Council has the Goldstone report to the UN Security Council forwarded ". We're leaving now to delegitimize those who try to delegitimize us"

This lobby operates their untold business since the failure of the Camp David negotiations in summer 2000 and the recapture of the so-called autonomous areas by the Sharon government. The crimes and violations of international law and human rights, since are committed, can be even of benevolent circles not justify rationally, hence they resorted to means of slander, discredit, slander and distortion of the truth. This is also why works so well because the ruling political elites better time came when they needed then to deal with not even the perversion of their so-called Western values by Israel.

over the wickedness of anti-Semitism you probably need to lose a word. As for any form of racism and stigmatization of dissidents and believers, such as currently the Muslims must be condemned. Zuckerman had already in his book "Two Holocaust" on the exploitation of this unique crime against humanity, both by Israel and by Germany wrote. In his latest work, he pointed to this theory justifiably, as the basis for the critics of Israeli government policy has deteriorated dramatically. Them in some places threatens the destruction of their professional existence, and this with the active help of philo (the actual anti-Semites) who talk and act as a racist neo-conservative partisans rollback policy of the U.S. neo-colonialism.

The functionalization of the Holocaust by the Israeli government is evident to the author. This "Zionization the Shoah" is filled several times. Was played by the Shoah the establishment of Israel on the international stage is not the least important role. Who reread the minutes of the debate in the UN will find that no less than the then UN representatives of the Soviet Union, Andrei Gromyko, was the only one who had declared that the Jewish people because of the crimes of the Holocaust and the failure of the West , one to prevent such a state would entitle. For the then Zionist representatives, it was the biggest political issues, the establishment of the state by "public law" and calling for a "natural right" to achieve. So much for the knowledge gap of Israel supporters.

For German readers particularly interesting is the second part. Here is yet another typical German debate see how it can be done only in Germany with a deeply insecure and incompetent political elite. The manner of a well-known "mind police" this anti-Semitic philo ever wanted to know who the real "anti-Semite." The author criticizes the resulting trivialization of anti-Semitism and the "Banality of Evil" by the sect of the anti-Germans and their "willing accomplice". He writes: "Like the anti-Semite who maintained paranoid in all Jewish a threat because he fears the Jews own life and deficits projected, it shall issue the anti-Israel German fans a damning testimony. According to him, "sees the 'anti-German' Jews and Israel friend in particular the threat of 'antisemitism', on which he projected what he had to admit to themselves not just because he identifies with him: his own referenced in the latent anti-Semitic movement ".

is worth noting the increasingly argued self-victimization by the Israeli government, also criticized the author. A country that is crammed on both ears with nuclear, biological and chemical weapons as well as the highly advanced U.S. conventional weapons, sees himself still as the "victims", such Country has in fact no security, but a psychological problem.

The fact that the author not only of the "anti-German" and other obscure fans Israel is criticized, given her credit. His book puts the finger in both the Israeli and German wounds, and this is a good thing. If even the political class in Germany does not mean anything, can they should least of all the radicals of the left who still rudimentary position themselves in the party "The Left", dismiss their criticism of the anti-democratic machinations of the Israel supporters and their philo-Semitic friends in Germany vehemently . But the book offers sugar's good arguments. It should also participate in the media, But here already hops and malt is lost. A very useful book that gives the political attitude of the Germans botched talking points at hand. Whether they do this at all, but may be doubted.

Published in ProMedia Publishing.

Lacunar In Farct In Left

The myth of the "paradigm shift" in the Middle East conflict

The debate about the sense or nonsense of a one-state solution as a "silver bullet" to solve the Middle East conflict, as has been represented by the so-called Stuttgart Declaration, is to the next round. No less than the historian and political scientist Ilan Pappé the German scene beige skipped intellectually, to save what can still be saved is.

The criticism of the so-called "Stuttgart Declaration in which sought a one-state solution as the target for the settlement of the conflict and for the BDS campaign as a vehicle is claimed, has been criticized as unfair and dogmatic, as well as" utopia "means that can not be based on an actual and necessary campaign to put pressure on the Zionist state of Israel and promote self-determination for the Palestinians want. Representatives of a two-state solution has been certified in return a dogmatic adherence to the two-state solution of the writers / artist, which also repeated the part of Ilan Pappe is attested to by its proponents an "orthodox approach.

The utopia of a one-state solution is now scientifically enhanced, by being in the status of a "paradigm shift" does, so if you like, against criticism "immunized" and not declared to debate. Here, the idea of a very old hat and one-state solution has failed historically. It has now been fished out of the helplessness of the historical reminiscences Asservatenkammer out new drapes and presented as a "paradigm" to the public as a deus ex machina. (In parenthesis it should be mentioned for the scientifically-interested, that a paradigm shift only then can be said when the "old" paradigm has been falsified scientific or representative of such an "extinct" means.) However, it can be no question, because right now the "old" paradigm of two-state solution back with a vengeance on the world stage celebrates. That just sent

Ilan Pappé as witness for the state solution in the ring afterwards surprised, very much. In his article on a so-called "paradigm shift" he has a one-state solution in the BDS campaign mentioned in passing without really express it explicitly. In his interesting lectures in Stuttgart and the panel discussion, he mentioned the one-state solution with no word. Pappé talking about colonialism, zionism, ethnic cleansing and the concept of "ethnic purity of Israel" and its connection to the right of return for Palestinians.

Its main argument is against Zionism. The Zionist ideology is the main obstacle to a peaceful solution to the Middle East conflict dar. offer in this question is no dissent whatsoever between him and the "orthodox approach. That the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a colonial conflict, no one denies, and that Zionism has any good qualities, only claimed by its protagonists. For the colonized, this ideology means the almost total destruction of their existence in their home country.

The actions of the BDS campaign should therefore political and economic costs of occupation and the cooperation of States with the World colonizers been up in the air, that they are more portable for anyone. Your goal must be directed to the nationalist-ethnocentric ideology of Zionism which is contrary to the classic Western democracy diametrical. "Jewish and democartic" is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms. The representative of a single state should ask the Israeli-Zionist political elite, whether they even unwilling to meet the State of Israel, based on a Zionist legislation and its implementation, to integrate into the Middle East, let alone to let it rise, then?

In his autobiographical work " Out Of The Frame " Pappé no mention of a one-state solution as a conflict resolution model, nor in his recent interview in the weekly magazine "Friday" of 16 January 2011. In his Epilogue chapter of "Project: Disarm Israel" is not about state solution, which would mean the end of Israel as a state, what Pappé, I suspect, certainly not willing, but the main opponent of Judaism, Zionism und dessen zionistisch-kolonisatorisches Projekt in Palästina. „I do not recall the precise moment of awakening, but there was such a moment when the un-Jewishness and immorality of the project became clear to me. I did, and still equate Jewishness and morality, not as superior to any other position, but rather a comfortable heritage I belong to and I can rely on when making moral judgments. And from this perspective, the Zionist project abused this kind of Judaism and this kind of morality. Worst of all was the Zionist and later Israeli abuse of the Holocaust memory to justify the dispossession of Palestine that disconcerted and outraged me. The abuse is obvious and yet so many today can still not see it. It was the departure point human and Jewish that recently led so many Jews to oppose policies and crimes done in the name of the state of Israel. "Papp project of the" disarmament of Israel "means an" ideological disarmament ", that is, a de-Zionization Israel, but not its destruction or dissolution. The one-state solution is probably for him only "a dream" of a good world without evil state, a new beginning that may be called the land of Palestine, if one can understand his struggle for land and State Sun

Ilan Pappe has also at the Stuttgart Conference on the scandal of the 21 Century spoken, namely the Israeli occupation and ongoing colonization of Palestine. The Activists, he recommends that you conduct an intensive dialogue with Israel, which sees itself as part of the "civilized" world, while maintaining his "racist and supremacist" character. Who "Zionist mindset" the (board) does not understand, will also have no success in solving the Middle East conflict, be it in a one-or two-state solution.

The question is not answered, who should realize the the new paradigm of power politics. It provides only a few keywords as headings, without being filled with substantial content. Now Playing at the international level, an unprecedented wave of diplomatic recognition of the State of Palestine. It is speculated that not even the U.S. a state of Palestine in 2011 to recognize diplomatically. Apart from some activists in the world no one is talking about a one-state solution. Except for a handful of Israelis believe that almost 100 percent of the Israelis the idea of a "bad joke". Israeli Friends / interior gave me to the question of one-state solution to the answer: "Are you kidding" (Want to take you on my arms?) Before the one-state solution can be implemented, it must first take place a "deprogramming" of the political consciousness of the Israelis , Cardboard (to himself) so wonderfully executed and described in Stuttgart and in his book has described.

who only "salvation" sees one-state solution takes the Palestinian people the opportunity to make a free decision for his future. The right to self-determination is the Palestinians as well as to the Israelis. Only if the former have come into their own, they have the option to choose other options. The solidarity movement will not be the serious smarter than the collective will of the Palestinian people! To German concerns and qualms should generally take no consideration, as they are in relation to the Middle East conflict apolitical, that is one-sided. "Stuttgart was a station. The train goes somewhere else now continue "as Pappé euphemistically describes. I hope he does not drive to nowhere.

Say Someone Having A Baby

PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

A post-traumatic stress disorder, the result may not be processed experiences of violence. Armed conflicts always bring a high level of violence. Physically and mentally. ascribe any returning soldiers but a coping disorder to want is unrealistic and counterproductive.


As a German translation of the English technical term Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the term Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has naturalized. This term is not always sufficiently differentiated and contains word semantic misunderstandings. More appropriate designation would be the Post Traumatic Stress processing disorder. Or better yet, a processing disorder post-traumatic stress.

Post Traumatic Stress due to a stressful life event that sometimes several months or even years ago. Therefore, "post-traumatic. This post-traumatic stress is neither unusual nor disease. Rather, it is a normal reaction of the body to process an experience of violence whatsoever. Only when the self-healing powers of the human body is no longer sufficient to stress the Lord will happen is a "disorder", a processing disorder can lead to serious health problems and cope is recognized as a disease.

But not every experience of violence leads to trauma. And not every trauma inevitably leads to a stress management disorder.


The causes: perceptions decoupling
A broad consensus exists on the psychological trauma on the causes for the emergence of stress processing disorders. Accordingly, experience of violence in the body but also emotional meaning in connection with a demolition exercise to a trauma. A demolition exercise always occurs when fears are so great that the conscious experience a situation impossible and often culminate not in fear of death. It does not matter whether the event time or run-off over time. A perception decoupling will take place at the height of stress experience and flows mostly in shock. The research agrees that a perception of isolation is bound to a trauma. Less clearly defined is, however, occurred in the extent of force must have to cause trauma.

The effects
The medicine differs in three Traumatisierungsgrade:
The simple post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic complex and the third degree, the dissociative identity disorder. In 1940, Charles Myers, described the first time how the split personality of soldiers in the First World War by the Kriegstraumatisierungen in an "apparently normal personality (ANP) and an" emotional personality "(EP). This split personality is a criterion to define the severity of traumatic stress disorder and to organize a promising therapy.

Simple Post-traumatic stress disorder
The degree of complexity I, the simple PTSD, consists of an ANP and EP. "Simple" in this case, the trauma giving rise to the processing problem has occurred only once in time and within strict limits. This severity can be attributed to a very good chance of recovery.

chronic complex stress disorder
If there are multiple traumas is that last longer and / or of brutal nature, may be the personality of the victim's split into an "apparently normal personality" ANP, which the everyday rules and must more "emotional personalities" EP's. Thus, for example, contain an EP most of the fear and pain from the traumatic experience, another EP the anger of the offender and another part of other a depersonalized observer position.

Dissociative Identity Disorder
The third severity describes a structural dissociation, which occurs when it is necessary for the victim because of longstanding and severe traumatic experience was more suitable for everyday use figures (ANP) to develop and more emotional personality (EP). In this case, a dissociative identity disorder. The two main symptom clusters of PTSD are reliving the trauma, and permanent avoidance of stimuli that have to do with the trauma.

Symptoms
was recognized that ignorance of the entire clinical picture regularly can be a source of traumatization for victims or even acts as a multiplier. Modern trauma therapy is now well structured and follows a consistent and verifiable treatment model.

symptoms of PTSD include:
- depression, anxiety, panic disorders
- Psychotic derailments
- Chronic psychosomatic pain disorders
- Severe physical symptoms such as inflammation in the body
- self-injury
- impulse control disorders
- foreign aggression and self-aggression
- Abnormal
sexuality - but also on alertness and seismographic ability to anticipate situations

especially in popular scientific papers is often suggested, each of these features have unique character and ill every person who had one or more symptoms has on stress management disorder. What is basically wrong. All the listed symptoms may occur singly or in combination, as well as in healthy, non-traumatized people. Even the temporary loss of concentration, change in focus of attention or other states of consciousness such as daydreaming, imagination, altered sense of time and trance-like behavior per se are no signs of PTSD and dissociation. Concentration and sleep disturbances and nightmares can also be symptoms of self-healing powers of the body that tries to process a stressful life event.

A question also on the current research can be answered adequately is the fact, why one and the same event can cause a number of persons with varying degrees of trauma. An attack on a convoy for example, who should be noticed by all parties with the same intensity causes a stress on the one person processing disorder that leads to disability and even as far as possible a normal life impossible. In another person it solves only a simple post-traumatic stress disorder from. A third person has not unlimited post-traumatic stress, but remains spared from disease symptoms.
The research suggested that different degrees of Vortraumatisierung varying degrees of stress management disorder. A Vortraumatisierung can be achieved either on purpose or it occurs arbitrarily by certain circumstances in some cases by the parties concerned, unobserved.


Sources:

Onno van der Hart, Michael Huber, "The phobia overcome before the trauma, trauma and violence, 1 / 2007

Michaela Huber, Structural Dissociation, 2006

Dave Grossman, On killing, Back Bay Books, New York, 1996

Henning Hoffmann, fire fighting and tactics, DWJ Verlags-GmbH, Blaufelden, 2008

Whatis The Healthiewst Yogurt For You

Sarah Palin's America by Heart

Sarah Palin appeared out of nowhere in 2008 as a vice presidential candidate John McCain. Back then they did just that Alaska is one of the United States. Whether she also knows when the U.S. had purchased it from Tsarist Russia, is not known. Your world view is described as simple yet positive. Since she has stepped down as governor of Alaska, working on her presidential candidacy for the Republicans in 2012. To achieve this goal, she pulls out all the rhetorical register.

It is the Shooting star of the so-called tea-party movement, a petty bourgeois movement with fascist tendencies. At events it considers nationalist-bombastic speeches, serve all the resentments that are in the "land of opportunity," especially in vogue. It is the "dancing-queen" of belligerent neocons, the Christian fundamentalists and the most reactionary elements of the Republican Party.

America by Heart "is its political manifesto. How much has it contributed to his own hand, remains in the realm of speculation. The personal and biographical notes you can benefit from keeping their own power. The historical and intellectual history and economic-political passages may come from whoever. exuberantly thanked them, experience with the publicist Jessica Gavora, who is married by chance with the conservative journalist Jonah Goldberg.

your book is a manifestation of American nationalism and exceptionalism. A tribute to the military. The self-assessment of the U.S. as a "shining city on the hill" has degenerated into the imperial history of the United States to a cartoon. In the face of neo-colonial wars of conquest in Iraq and Afghanistan, it sounds like utter cynicism. Over the entire book away, she works at her enemy, President Barak Hussein Obama will. The hostile Rhetoric and the hate-tirades of Palin, Limbaugh, O 'Reilly and Glenn Beck is subject to a subtext: racism. Never before has a U.S. president by reactionary elements has been so demonized as Obama. He compares it to "Hitler" and that he was in truth a "Muslim" or even "communist". This climate of dehumanization of political opponents could probably have contributed to the attack on the Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords of Tucson, Arizona. The constituency of these delegates was marked by her on her Facebook page with a crosshair. This political symbol should stigmatize all those who voted for Obama's health care reform as Mrs Giffords. Palin Schlachruf however was: "Do not Retreat, Instead - Reload!" They went so far in their apology that they had a "blood libel" (blood libel) is set in the world to promote hatred and violence. Rather than fight it. Whether she knows the background of such a vile comparison can not be assumed. She also had called Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, " to bring down "

America by Heart "could be Palin's battle cry for her upcoming presidential campaign. God's grace in the world if they would be chosen. Who politically irresponsible rants around, when the opportunity could also be irresponsible with nuclear weapons to shoot around. The dark forces behind it in favor of other wars the United States, such as against Iran. Their diffuse philosophy of a "common sense constitutional conservatism" based on the Constitution and common sense reminds very much of George W. Bush 'benign conservatism "which turned out to be paired as a brutal economic Darwinism with aggressive wars of conquest, which the West a disaster have fallen.

Palin speaks for many pages about their religious inclinations, similar to those of Bush. This is also bad guess. Bush relied on his decisions again and again to a "higher inspiration" and his direct line to a transcendence. Palin is a fanatical opponent of abortion.

The popularization of their reactionary worldview is accomplished largely by the conservative media. The political opponents should take their comments on nation, faith, military and nationalism just noticed, so that he can not say that he had not wanted, let not then known. A female George W. Bush, the U.S. has not earned for the next hundred years. This political pamphlet is no need for translation into other languages.

How To Wire A Sensor To Internal Light

reading recommendations

Leadership and Training for the Fight
Paul R. Howe

Paperback 208 pages
Publisher: AuthorHouse (October 4, 2005)
English
ISBN: 978-1420889505
Price: 14, - €
direct order

Paul Howe, a former master sergeant of the Delta Force is expressed in this book, his thoughts on the training of soldiers executive staff in particular. The mental preparation to use is the focus. In the past five years the book has become a standard work in the area that the Americans love to call it "mindset". It is the classic by Jeff Cooper for "Principles of Personal Defense" in the knowledge gained in anything.
The book is recommended not only for active soldiers, but for anyone who started in 2011 with the intent to change something in his life.

More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws by John R. Lott


Paperback: 472 pages
Publisher: University of Chicago Press; 3 Edition (May 15, 2010)
Language: English
ISBN-13: 978-0226493664
Price: 15, - €
direct order

Is there a causal relationship between the number of firearms in private hands and the crime rate? Yes, there are and the result is not surprising. The newly published third Edition of the book the authors analyze the numerous statistics of the past ten years. Together with the data already in the first and 2 Were collected edition, the book does now back on crime statistics from a total of 29 years. This consideration will be given especially to the U.S. states that have undertaken during the reporting period, a drastic liberalization of their firearms legislation and its citizens have allowed the run of covert firearms.
The crime rates have dropped significantly within a few years after the legal relief.
More Guns, Less Crime is down all officials and gun owners their argument to the heart.

1,000 euros for everyone: freedom. Equality. Basic income
Götz Werner and Adrienne Goehler

Paperback: 265 pages
Publisher: Econ (11 August 2010)
ISBN: 978-3430201087
Price: 18, - €
direct order

Goetz Werner, the founder of the dm drugstore chain is a staunch advocate of unconditional basic income for everyone. This initiative circulated for several years. Götz Werner presents in this book, which is why it is practically feasible and would have positive effects, the idea of basic income on our society. He also reveals the low motives of policy, to make headway against the initiative.

democracy. The God who is not
Details of Hans-Hermann Hoppe

edition: 547 pages Publisher
: Manuscriptum, 2nd edition (October 15, 2003)
ISBN: 978-3933497864
Price: 24,80 €
direct order

democracy must serve more as a synonym for law and order, freedom and security, prosperity, rule of law and the liberal constitutional state. This democracy is only an administrative form, say at the 51% of people remaining 49% of what they have done. Hans-Hermann Hoppe
exerts fundamental criticism of this system with its fundamental weaknesses.

hand weapons of the Bundeswehr
by Dr. Jan-Phillipp Weisswange

The report will be publishing a book on small arms Bundeswehr appear. It is not the first of its kind comprehensive and lengthy research work of the author Dr. Jan-Phillip Weiss cheek but lets hope for a publication that will become the standard work.



Kyle Lamb

The U.S. shooting instructor and author Kyle Lamb (Viking Tactics) will be launching in the course of 2011, his second book on the market. Object of study is the short weapon and its use in the tactical environment. The quality of the photos should be clearly distinct from his first book, "Green Eyes & Black Rifles". The scope of the book should be more than 300 pages and nearly 1,000 pictures.




fire fighting tactics &
Henning Hoffmann

Paperback: 288 pages Publisher
: DWJ Verlags-GmbH, 2 Edition (March 2011)
ISBN: 978-3936632712
Price: 22,95 €
direct order

In March 2011 appears the revised and expanded second Edition of "fire fighting and tactics." The scope of the new edition has been expanded by about 20%. The foreword was written by Paul Howe.

I Have Groin Pains Randomly ?

John Strawson, partitioning Palestine

This book does away with some myths that surrounded the Israeli-Palestinian conflict until today. One myth, for example, is the belief that the creation of the Jewish state is commonly regarded as a form of international compensation to the Jews for the Holocaust. It is claimed that guilt, in particular “western guilt”, led the international community to foist the Jews onto the innocent Palestinians, and thus provoking the conflict.

John Strawson’s penetrating analysis of the UN debates and the partition proposal contained in the report of UNSCOP (United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) show no such intention. The Holocaust is rarely mentioned, and there are no expressions of guilt. UNSCOP´s recommendations for partition were not “intended as a solution to the ´Jewish problem`”. The author is struck by the callous manner in which the Holocaust was either ignored or referred to. In the debate on the report in the United Nations, there were also anti-Semitic remarks which were common and never challenged.

What is even more noteworthy, is the fact, that the representative of the Soviet Union to the UN Security Council, Andrej Gromyko, was the only one arguing that the Jewish people had the right to their one state because they not only incurred the Holocaust but also by “the inaction of the Western allies to prevent the Holocaust”. Gromyko continued: “It would be unjustifiable to deny this right to the Jewish people, particularly in view of all it has undergone during the Second World War.” The Soviet Union went even further in supporting the UN partition resolution by describing Zionism as the “national liberation movement of the Jewish people”. In contrast to Gromyko’s arguments, the main aim of the Zionist representatives was to establish the Jewish state by “public law”; they never used the Holocaust as a supportive argument. On the other hand, the Palestinian side regards this Zionist aim as “illegal”. Both sides have their legal narratives of international law to legitimize their actions and delegitimize those of the other. The author regards this kind of “legal fundamentalism” as a major stumbling block towards a peaceful settlement between both peoples.

John Strawson is Reader in Law at the University of East London. From 1996 to 2006 he visited Palestine and taught at the Institute of Law at Birzeit University in Ramallah. Despite being fully aware of the brutality the occupation inflicts upon the daily life of the Palestinians, he puts forward a convincing case for the Zionist-Israeli side. He shows to the reader that its claim is supported by facts and documents, and that international law is not implicitly on the side of the Palestinians as many people presume. Having taken the UN documents seriously and as a point of departure for the discussion, the author does not see these legal instruments as dictating a singular meaning but rather what possibilities they offer to the solution of the current stalemate. In his introductory remarks, Strawson warns the reader that this book will irritate not only Israelis and Palestinians but also their supporters, and he is right. First, one has to get rid of the idea that international law sets a series of strict imperatives that must be followed. The book “Partitioning Palestine” conveys a specific message: “Law and justice cannot operate without wisdom. International law needs to encode the wisdom of compromise that can aid both parties to attain their state on the basis of full equality and security.” The international community needs to guarantee that this happens.

All seven chapters focus on different ways in which Israelis and Palestinians have narrated the key legal texts of the conflict, such as the League of Nations Mandate, the UN partition plan and the Oslo accords. The author demonstrates how the conflicting readings of these documents have shaped national identity and exacerbated the conflict. In chapter one, Strawson shows that the future of Palestine was already an international concern in 1917 when the US supported the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people. Supreme Court Judge Louis Brandeis convinced US President Woodrow Wilson to put US influence in the balance for a Jewish state. The Balfour Declaration did the rest: It “clarified the national rights of the Jewish people while apparently questioning national rights for the Palestinians”.

When the League of Nations mandated Palestine to the British, the text of the Mandate for Palestine “represented a major victory for the Zionists in that the Jewish national home assumes the central place in the text”, writes the author. Article 4 granted to the Zionist movement an officially recognized role in Palestine. This role was not only confined to represent the Palestinian Jews but to “secure the co-operation of all Jews”. In this document “the Palestinian Arabs are not designated as a people”. The Arab character of Palestine was only alluded to in the form of the language. Besides English and Hebrew there was also Arabic. The collaboration between the Hashemite and the Zionist representatives administered a severe blow to the interest of the Palestinian people. This collaboration lasted until the 1930s when Palestinian lawyer Wissam Boustany challenged the legality of the Mandate, although his use of the term “legalization” appeared as if he had accepted “that the Jewish national home was a lawful project”, writes the author. His political characterization of the conflict as international became highly significant. Palestinian identity and Arab nationalism overlapped and became the main feature of future developments. According to Strawson, Palestine was to become a symbol of Arab unity which was being threatened by Zionism. Consequently, legal rights in Palestine were to be seen as affecting the legal rights of all Arabs.

What the Palestinian and Arab leadership had not fully grasped was the shift of power during the Second World War. The Arab League reconstituted the Arab Higher Committee (AHC) with the totally discredited Mufti Haj Amin Al Husseini at its head but with Jamal Al Husseini actually responsible for it in Palestine. Despite the Mufti´s close collaboration with the Nazi regime, the Palestinian leadership was to defend the Mufti after the war. Within the Zionist camp there were many protagonists calling for a bi-national solution. The most prominent organization was Hashomer Hatzair whose political party Mapam gained the second largest number of seats in the first Israeli Knesset. But after the adoption of the partition resolution the support for these ideas among the Jewish community ended significantly, writes Strawson.

The UNSCOP was established in May of 1947 with the task of making proposals for a solution on the future of the country. The Arab League did not cooperate with UNSCOP. The report included, however, a reference to an authoritative statement of the Arab League on Palestine which it took as an “Arab assessment”. In one passage, Zionism was accused as an “expansionist projects at the expense of the Arab countries”. It involves “recourse of terrorism” and the establishment of a “secret army” which would cause an “atmosphere of tension and unrest”. Further it declared that “against a state established by violence, the Arab states will be obliged to use violence; that is a legitimate right of self-defense”. John Strawson concludes: The content of the statement was clear: “the Arab League was threatening to use force if a Jewish state were to be created.” Any violence by Arabs – and not just Palestinian Arabs – was not only a legitimate response, but also constituted in their view self-defense, writes the author.

According to Strawson, in the UNSCOP recommendations there is only “one oblique reference to the Holocaust”, i. e. a reference to the displaced persons whose “present plight is difficult”. “The mass murder of Jews is never mentioned.” With few exceptions, this holds true for the debate of the report in the United Nations. “Contemporary arguments that the international community decided to create a Jewish state in a wave of guilt for the Holocaust is not borne out be reading UN documents. There were no expressions of guilt nor was there any public opposition to anti-Semitic statements expressed in the debates. It is noteworthy, that UNSCOP addresses not only the Jews in Palestine but also the “Jewish people as a whole”. Taking up this commitment, the report continues “would imply that all Jews in the world who wish to go to Palestine have the right to do so”. In lieu of the absence of a submission by the AHC, UNSCOP considered proposals by the Arab League to the London Palestine conference that called for a “unitary state, with a democratic constitution and an elected assembly”. This constitution contained articles that would limit Jewish representation in the democratic assembly to one-third, irrespective of the size of the Jewish population. The author writes that the actual proposal would have created a legally entrenched ethnic ascendancy, not unlike Northern Ireland at the time. “Yet the reality is that the 1947 proposals would have created a Palestine where Arabs would be legally privileged over Jews.” Strawson does not mention, however, that after the establishment of the State of Israel, the Zionists did privilege the Jewish inhabitants of Israel over their Arab compatriots by law, thus creating a state which discriminates against non-Jews.

The Soviet Union and its Eastern allies voted not only for the creation of a Jewish state but also provided military support for Israel´s war against the Arab armies, whereas the Palestinian Arabs increasingly became subject to the policies of the Arab world. When the author discusses the so-called Israeli Declaration of Independence, he stresses the legitimacy for the state on the basis of historical claims and the way they had been recognizes by the “international community”. The Jewish state was established by public law as a “natural right”, and no invocation of a divine right to the state was made. The Holocaust was mentioned in the declaration not as a justification for its establishment, but “as the acute modern example of why the Zionist movement´s project of overcoming the homelessness of the Jewish people was necessary”. The Holocaust was seen as part of the narrative of the Jewish people. The author dismisses the widespread assumption that the Holocaust was the central reason for the establishment of the Jewish state. With the exception of the Soviet Union, none of the other actors at the time saw Israel´s creation as a compensation of the Holocaust.

When Strawson discusses Israel´s policy of expulsion of the Palestinians, he does neither endorse the arguments made by Benny Morris nor those of Ilan Pappé or Nur Masalha. He not only rejects Morris´ argument that the displacement of the Palestinians was “inherent in Zionist ideology”, but also Pappé´s who claims that the Plan D was a “blue print for ethnic cleansing”, not to speak of Masalha´s notion that transfer (expulsion) was a “secret policy”. Contrary to their views, he argues that transfer was not central to Zionism. As a case in point, he quotes the revisionist Zionist leader Zeev Jabotinsky who was totally opposed to transfer. The “evidence” of the notion of transfer can only be linked to the figure of Yosef Weitz who, according to the author, was the only figure campaigned before and after the creation of Israel for such a policy.

At the end of his book, Strawson argues that the main obstacle to a solution of the conflict lies in the legal narratives of Palestinians and Israelis, which reinforce rather than resolve the conflict. In the last chapter the author places most of the blame on Israel´s policy, while in the other chapters he regards the Zionist-Israeli narrative as better supported by the documents than the Palestinian-Arab one. For Strawson, Zionism and Palestinian nationalism are equally legitimate. Neither side has the right to use international law as claim to sole representation. International law should be used to foster dialogue on the basis of equality, self-determination and human rights. Only through “Partitioning Palestine” can the conflict be ended, so the author. According to him, Israel´s colonial settlements, the rights of refugees to return to the Palestinian state and ending both state violence and terrorism must be addressed. International law should be deployed, not to censor either side but to provide the means for peace and reconciliation. Taking Israel's and the U.S. American rejectionist policies into account, one must be skeptical Whether international law can Fulfill the author's expectations. People with a fixed image of the conflict will find the book irritating.

First published here and here .

Where Does Kates Playground Live

make book on variable sales compensation and sales performance of Gunther Wolf

11.1.11 From the shop: The fourth book by author and performance management consultant Gunther Wolf. It's about maximizing sales, and more specifically to the three key sales objectives: The performance of the sales increase, while optimizing value creation, income and processes and top-seller inspire and bind.

who faces the task of renewing outdated pay systems in sales, this book will love like no other. Because first of the book follows up almost like the typical prescription project focusing on introducing or updating of variable remuneration.

variable compensation - a success story

Second, the reader will find plenty of it to the location Practice tips and sample cases. Gunther Wolf identifies the specific problems, what solutions are possible and how they were implemented to increase sales performance.

The experienced consultants take the reader by the hand guides him step by step through the project proves him of any opportunities and impending pitfalls.

consultant knowledge compressed

And third, the book is aimed at the practitioner. Scientific digressions Gunther Wolf saves us as much as possible: it is limited to short, concise information on the theoretical foundations of performance management, motivation and compensation systems, interested readers.

Gunther Wolf knows whereof he speaks. The security that springs from every line of the book, he refers in a now barely countable number of successful compensation and performance projects. "No performance-Pope, only a very good converter and consultants," says Gunther Wolf about themselves.

old compensation systems supersede

"Modern managers, modern distribution structures, modern people, since can not use the variable compensation systems remain the old," says Gunther Wolf, who works for selected medium-sized companies and established global corporations for nearly 20 years.

who as a leader of this Topic and the potential of its employees seriously, the performance will increase the sales team long term. But Gunther Wolf opens the treasure chest of knowledge consultant: He shares his experiences in this book about the increase in sales performance through modern systems of variable sales compensation with the reader.

from practice for practice

Straightforward, clear, without rhetorical loops and turns out Gunther Wolf the reader through the topic. Easy to read, almost amusing, the book comes along and offers practical yet all-encompassing knowledge. Great benefits and competitive advantages Gunther Wolf gives once again by his innovations. He asserts: "All Designed for customers in practice and therefore already well established. "

This includes about if-then logic, the incentives for the pursuit of goals is not winning. Or the assessment rate ingenious combination, with the affordability of the variable compensation cost tense situations is ensured.

Innovative compensation systems a competitive advantage

His concept of relative targets provides sales managers with the necessary in increasingly turbulent expectant times target flexibility. The reader learns the Wolf'sche onion familiar with whose help he power and performance targets the salesperson differentiated.

In innovative dance can not be missing, developed by Gunther Wolf optimization. With this, some companies have taken performance-jumps, where few have previously considered feasible.

Top Sales Performance

It focuses the entire book on the three key marketing objectives: increase sales performance, while optimizing value creation, income and processes and top-seller inspire and bind. The latter aspect is for Gunther Wolf result and a prerequisite for sales performance at the same time: top executives in sales, are already in short supply and will continue for various reasons, increasingly rare.

Many sales managers fear in view of the introduction or revision of the variable sales compensation to deal with emerging concerns and reservations of its sales staff. Gunther Wolf shows how to deal with these resistors targeted and how variable pay systems such that they inspire sales teams and attract more high-performing employees.

Conclusion: Buy it!

Variable Sales Compensation - The turbo for your sales performance, "Gunther Wolf's new book. A strong recommendation for advanced, future-and performance-oriented managers of distribution.

Wolf, Gunther: Variable Sales Compensation - The Turbo for Sales Performance: Optimizing value creation, income and processes, top seller inspire and bind. Hamburg: Verlag Dashöfer 2011th
ISBN: 978-3-941201-96-5 (print version) or 978-3-941201-95-8 (PDF).
"The book is also available as e-book sales variable compensation .

Links:

• order direct from the publisher: variable sales compensation
• look inside the book: Management Consulting variable sales compensation
• Other publications of Gunther Wolf

Gunther Wolf, WOLF: Information about goal setting.

Bullet Brie Black Cat

trust working time on the basis of agreed targets

in current monster Center staff can find a professional review of the IO Business Consulting Services and Training.

goal-and result-oriented working time on trust

When trust working time not recorded beginning and end. This eliminates the problem of "overtime" but not, the excess of the agreed daily work time must be covered by law.

is therefore associated with trust in the working time, especially a change of mindset and attitudes. Instead of the presence of a contractually agreed working hours include the completion of tasks the body are associated. Particular emphasis is placed on achieving the agreed objectives.

trust working time requires new thinking

office hours, opening times, or shift times are certain limits to the result-and goal-oriented working time. It depends on the objectives of the teams to agree on meaningful.

The passage of time orientation is not easy for employees and managers. Because the unit of time is objective and easy to check for executives. The achievement of goals or work products other hand, requires an intensive study of the work content of each employee.

confidence work requires time management skills

Especially in the area of employee and team management is the positive effect of trust in the working time considerably. The point is not that the employee is serving the time to 17 clock, but does its tasks in a goal-oriented.

Without trust it is not. Not without responsibility. Without control, not natural. The employee has to plan even the task to perform and to timely and reliable.

for trust-based working time agreement is the target base. By objectives, the success of enterprise and leadership is founded.

agree on goals, Responsibility require

The manager targets agreed with the staff who work according to their tasks or projects. By successfully completing the tasks assigned to them and the result-oriented approach to the work show the staff that they deserve the trust towards them.

The Company has agreed targets and trust work time by eliminating the cost of time and attendance, as well as the increase of labor productivity. The workers can connect through self-determined division of labor work and family life.

Links:

• Read the article: trust working time
• information on working time
• checklists and job aids: working hours, work forms

Gunther Wolf, Wolf Management Advisory: Information on goal setting.

What Is The Length Of Megan Good Weave?

to "Vision" one-state solution in the Middle East

The Stuttgart conference in late November and the subsequent "Stuttgart Declaration" have turned out to be what feared critic, as a document of division of civic solidarity movement in so-called visionaries and old "experts" who we must leave behind. Not "utopians" were asked, but "visionary".

former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt has answered critics of his pragmatic attitude in the arms race debate, which have accused him of a lack of "visions": ". Anyone who has visions should go to the doctor" The "vision" of a single state can only Israel by the further colonization of the Palestinian homeland can be realized. The "vision" one-state solution is a utopia as the "Civitas Solis" ("The Sun") by Thommaso Campanella, and the "visionaries" are the real utopians.

If in an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, entitled claimed " cowardice before a friend " in a kind of total disregard of the realities of power politics, it was not enough to spread a "hope ideology," just because this in certain religious and political circles, sell better, inevitably raises the question of who supposedly sell for such an ideology. One can imagine though, to whom these poison arrows have been shot down, but a frank statement of the author would seek to clarify the fronts.

Who Blog of the great jazz saxophonist Gilad Atzmon totally unreflective praise and more exuberant confesses that Atzmon for his greeting insert was fascinated by proposing that Atzmon for his extremist positions, such as his entry for the "dissolution of Israel and its replacement by a pan-Palestinian state, has earned not only for massive contradiction, but is rejected because of his historical revisionist theses of many parts of the Solidarity movement. The civil society solidarity movement should not go along that road to extremism, because that would be grist for the mills of the ongoing delegitimization of the Israeli Government and its Supported against so-called Israel critics.

Opinions to a one-state solution as a two-state solution should have an intellectual thought models have the same status and are discussed undogmatic . Who it unnecessarily a "religious war" makes splits, not only the civic solidarity movement, but also marked the BDS campaign in the back.

Dental Nurse Cv Template

goal setting sustainable

At the conference, the self-GmbH in Frankfurt, Gunther Wolf before practical approaches to take into account sustainability aspects of goal setting and variable remuneration.

Strong interest was in human resources managers while the model of the target optimization. Here are the slides of his lecture from 1 pulse December 2010 for download. [...]

"Making goal setting sustainable" Read the full article

Gunther Wolf, Wolf Management Advisory: Information on goal setting.

Directions For Arcade Alley

The "rogue state": the United States of America?

I like the American empire for decades in the pose, other countries that do not submit to their dictates or offer its hegemony-quest the nerve to as "rogue states" or "evil empire" slander and ultimately attacked. No Noam Chomsky therefore lower than his country has called a "rogue state". The history of the United States shows that no country threatens the freedom and sovereignty of other States than the United States of America, and this even in the name of "spreading democracy", American-style one might add. With the exception of the anti-colonial liberation war that led to the independence of the United States, aimed all other wars of conquest of territories and countries that the U.S. has never left. Of the many coups in which the United States was involved through its Central Intelligence Agency, to say nothing. In more than three quarters all states U.S. soldiers are stationed, and there are 1000 military bases, ie these countries are virtually occupied, their sovereignty is considered limited. Voluntarily leave the United States has no country again, where they have been fixed once. From Vietnam and Iran, they could be sold only by force. If Barack Hussein Obama by withdrawing from Iraq or Afghanistan speaks, it means nothing, as the definition order of 50 000 U.S. combat troops "U.S. reconstruction workers" shows. The U.S. occupation history teaches something else: The U.S. will withdraw voluntarily from any occupied country until they and their accomplices be expelled by force from them.

As indicated by the publication of WikiLeaks has become known worldwide, the U.S. embassies' intelligence centers, such as the statement of the U.S. State Department to the UN representative of the U.S. shows. That the U.S. embassies with CIA officials are packed, is an open secret. That it also in the "friendly" countries is an army of informants, may be required. The most recent example of a "benevolent interlocutor of Americans" was a very close associate of the FDP leader Guido Westerwelle, who also is a German Foreign Ministers. That the U.S. embassies and CIA employees were involved in numerous coups, is known. Whether it's 1953 Iran, in 1973 in Chile, as it was in numerous US-controlled banana republics of the case. In many countries the CIA has helped to destabilize US-unfriendly governments significantly. Other countries are demonized as China or Iran today. States will be attacked under the pretext of promoting international terrorism such as Afghanistan and Iraq, or be hidden proxy wars conducted in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia or in Africa. It seems that the war belongs to breathe second nature of U.S. empire like the air.

Of 32 armed conflicts in the first decade of the 21st Century it is two-thirds to clashes with the Islamic world. Since the clash of civilizations thesis of Bernard Lewis (1964) and Samuel P. Huntington (1993) leads the West a "crusade" against Islam, and Since 9 / 11 of an Islamist jihad against the West. It seems to have forgotten that Al Qaeda had an American-Pakistani-Saudi Arabian midwife. The U.S. has contributed significantly to the fundamentalism of the Middle East, because they have misunderstood the secular Arab nationalism as a vehicle for communist and thus combat and allied itself with the most reactionary Islamic representatives and organizations. This writes the scientist Gilbert Achcar: "The present strength of Islamic fundamentalism is a direct product of very direct U.S. policies (...) Secular nationalism has been weakened and destroyed by the United States as its main enemy. In the 1960s, the dominant trend in the Muslim world in general and what secular nationalism in the Arab world, Arab nationalism as embodied by Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser. The United States fought this brand of nationalism, basing itself on the most reactionary brand of Islamic fundamentalism implemented and propagated by the Saudi kingdom. "Palestinian state in 43 years continued occupation by Israel and the U.S. empire in Afghanistan and Iraq have reinforced this trend. The oldest ally of the U.S. in the Middle East the way, is not Israel, but Saudi Arabia.

Ever since the attacks the U.S. and its "willing executioners" in Afghanistan and Iraq, which has led to a humanitarian catastrophe in these countries, the West is in a crisis of legitimacy. These wars in the name of "Western values" have exposed the moral low point located and the democracies of the West. To save even more credibility to what can be saved to the states should adopt the West of the U.S. occupation of these countries because they are usually cast in a U.S. ad infinitum remain trapped. It will put billions of euros and U.S. dollars in the sand, all of Social and lack of economic programs. Poverty in the United States and the countries of the European Union has reached record highs. Hartz IV recipients in Germany are to receive five more € alms, while billions are sunk in the Hindu Kush. What is this, if not political cynicism? The Hindu Kush is not freedom, but the geopolitical expansion of the U.S. empire is defended and consolidated. This is not in the European and especially not in Germany's interest. The dubious nature of "Western values" and the moral crisis of the West are also manifested in the silence of the "Western states" with respect to the closure of the Gaza Strip by Israeli occupation forces. The humanitarian catastrophe of the people in this "open-air prison" is the flip side of the moral crisis of the West and its policy of double standards.

The European Union should be resolved by the U.S. dominance, because the values for which the U.S. empire is not "Western values". occupation, oppression, exploitation, murder, torture and imprisonment of people without due process are a caricature of Western values which dar. and the U.S. concept of a "permanent war" should the European democracies dissociate quickly. How obsessed and irrational act, the representatives of the U.S. empire, see the anti-democratic Machinations against the founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange. Not only civilian organizations are under pressure to sever all contacts with WikiLeaks, but f ührende Republicans including call openly for liquidation Assange, and the U.S. administration bends the law to a "legal basis" for a "show trial "to initiate against Assange. Extradition of Julian Assange to the United States must therefore be opposed because he expected there not only not a fair process, but, as Assange not wrongly believed his murder of all democratic forces of resistance. The solidarity of the democratic West and its civil society Forces should the U.S. troops are Bradley Manning, who is accused of "secret" material passed to WikiLeaks to have what is unproven. Mr. Manning is more than six months in solitary confinement under inhumane conditions held captive by him "weichzukochen" so that the evidence against Assange what had been promised him immunity. Manning's material is due to the fact that the world public learns how brutal the U.S. occupation troops behave in Iraq. The "killing spree" of the crew of a U.S. Apache attack helicopter on innocent civilians and their savior shows to the world probably only the tip of an iceberg of "benign" Hegemon, as some European analysts mistakenly interpret the expansion policy of the U.S. empire. Due to the still undiscovered possible war crimes committed by the U.S. occupation troops in Iraq and Afghanistan was Mao Zedong's famous slogan-thousand-flowers today to be turned: Let a Thousand bloom Bradley Manning and Julian Assange!